Comparison
ManySignal vs Tines: agentic SOC vs workflow automation
Tines is a best-in-class workflow automation platform. ManySignal is a full agentic SOC. The distinction matters when you're deciding what to build versus what to buy.
Tines
Workflow automation platform
Bought by security engineering teams that want to automate SOC tasks without writing code. Stories are the unit of work. No built-in detection, entity graph, or verdict model — Tines orchestrates; the SOC logic lives elsewhere.
ManySignal
Agentic SOC + MDR platform
Bought by security leaders who need the full triage-to-response loop — detection, entity graph, AI investigation, governed response — without staffing a team to build and maintain it. Platform ships the SOC brain, not just the plumbing.
Who buys each
Engineers vs operators
Tines fits teams where a security engineer will own the platform and author Stories. ManySignal fits teams where the outcome — verdicts on every alert, governed autonomous response — matters more than having control of every workflow node.
Feature comparison
| Capability | ManySignal | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Product category | Agentic SOC + MDR platform | Workflow automation / no-code SOAR |
| Detection surface | Shipped detections across endpoint, cloud, identity, network, email | No built-in detection engine — detections must come from upstream SIEM/EDR |
| Entity graph | Cross-source entity graph linking users, devices, IPs, and applications over time | No entity graph; context is per-story, not persistent across incidents |
| Behavioural baselines | Per-entity ML baselines for anomaly scoring | Not included; baseline data must be pulled via custom API actions |
| Triage agent | Autonomous agent investigates every alert, enriches context, assigns confidence score | Tines Cases + Chat adds LLM assistance; investigation logic must be authored in Stories |
| Verdict on every alert | True/false-positive verdict with evidence chain on 100% of alerts | No verdict model; outcome depends entirely on how a Story is authored |
| Response autonomy ladder | Configurable autonomy tiers: notify → contain → remediate, per alert class | Response actions possible via integrations; ladder governance must be hand-built in Story logic |
| Blast-radius limits | Built-in guardrails cap automated actions by scope and impact class | No native blast-radius concept; guardrails require custom conditional logic per Story |
| Per-tenant kill switch | One-click pause of all automated response per tenant, logged and auditable | Pause requires disabling or modifying individual Stories |
| Evidence trail | Immutable per-alert evidence log with reasoning steps, timestamps, and operator attestation | Audit log tracks Story runs; alert-level evidence must be captured explicitly in Story design |
| Connector count | 300+ pre-built integrations, managed and updated by ManySignal | 700+ community and native connectors; one of the largest integration libraries in security automation |
| Ingestion pricing model | Per-endpoint/user, not per GB or per alert volume | Priced per user seat; no ingestion charge |
| Deployment model | Cloud-native SaaS, multi-tenant with tenant isolation | Cloud SaaS; no on-premises option |
| Best-fit team size | Mid-market to enterprise SOC teams; MSPs and MSSPs | Security engineering teams with developer-oriented staff; scales to enterprise |
| MDR option | ManySignal MDR: managed 24/7 coverage backed by the same agent platform | No managed service; Tines is a tooling platform |
| Licensing model | Outcome-based: protected assets, not alert volume | User-seat SaaS subscription |
| Primary UI paradigm | Agent workbench — verdicts, evidence, and autonomy controls at the fore | Story builder — canvas-based drag-and-drop workflow editor |
Reflects publicly available information, provided in good faith. Verify current capabilities with each vendor.
Where each product genuinely wins
Tines genuine strengths
- Integration breadth. 700+ connectors and one of the most active practitioner-contributed template libraries in security automation. If the integration exists, Tines almost certainly has it.
- Developer-first UX. The Story builder is genuinely intuitive for engineers — low-code but not dumbed-down. Complex branching logic, jinja2 templating, and HTTP actions give real power.
- Community. A large, engaged practitioner community shares Stories openly. The equivalent of a package registry for SOC automation.
- Flexibility. Teams that want to own their automation logic entirely get that control. No opaque agent layer making decisions they can't inspect.
ManySignal genuine strengths
- Ships the SOC logic. Detection engine, entity graph, behavioural baselines, and verdict model are all included — teams do not author or maintain them.
- Verdict on every alert. 100% alert coverage with evidence-weighted true/false-positive verdicts, regardless of alert volume. Tines Stories only run where they've been built.
- Governed autonomy. Response autonomy ladder with blast-radius limits, per-tenant kill switch, and immutable audit trail — governance that security-conscious buyers require.
- MDR option. Teams that want 24/7 managed outcomes can activate ManySignal MDR on the same platform without re-procurement.
Moving from Tines to ManySignal
Teams typically run both platforms in parallel for a transition period, then narrow Tines to pure orchestration or retire it.
Weeks 1–2
Inventory Stories
Catalog all active Tines Stories. Classify each as detection-adjacent (triage/enrichment) or orchestration-only (ticketing, Slack, approvals).
Weeks 3–4
Parallel triage
Connect ManySignal to the same data sources. Run both systems against live alerts. Compare ManySignal verdicts against existing Tines-driven outcomes.
Weeks 5–6
Migrate triage Stories
Retire Tines Stories that duplicate ManySignal investigation steps. Wire ManySignal verdicts as Tines triggers for downstream orchestration Stories that remain.
Weeks 7–8
Stabilise and tune
Enable autonomous response tiers on validated alert classes. Retire or keep remaining Tines orchestration Stories based on team preference.
Decision guide
Choose ManySignal if...
- You need verdicts on every alert without authoring each investigation path.
- Alert volume is growing faster than your team's capacity to write and maintain Stories.
- Your security program requires an immutable evidence trail and governed autonomous response.
- You want an MDR option on the same platform without a separate service contract.
- Your buyers are security leaders prioritising outcomes, not engineering teams prioritising control.
Choose Tines if...
- You have security engineers who want to own automation logic end-to-end.
- Your detection and triage already works well — you need orchestration glue, not investigation intelligence.
- You rely on highly specialised integrations that benefit from Tines' breadth.
- Developer experience and workflow transparency are top priorities for your team.
- You're building bespoke automation that doesn't fit a standard SOC workflow model.
ManySignal vs Tines: common questions
Can Tines do what ManySignal does if we build the right Stories?
Tines can automate many of the same enrichment and response actions ManySignal executes, but the investigation logic, verdict model, entity graph, and autonomy governance must all be hand-authored and maintained. ManySignal ships those capabilities; Tines gives you the tools to build them yourself. The difference is build-vs-buy for the SOC brain, not just the plumbing.
We already have Tines for orchestration. Can we run ManySignal alongside it?
Yes. ManySignal can coexist with Tines: ManySignal handles detection, triage, and autonomous investigation while Tines continues orchestrating downstream workflows like ticket creation, Slack notifications, or approval gates. Some customers run both and use ManySignal's webhook output as a Tines trigger.
Tines has a huge template library. Does ManySignal have comparable coverage?
Tines' community library is genuinely impressive — over 700 templates from its active practitioner community. ManySignal ships 300+ integrations managed by the platform team, plus a detection library. Where Tines wins on community breadth, ManySignal ships detection logic and investigation reasoning, not just plumbing templates.
How does migration work if our team has invested heavily in Tines Stories?
Tines Stories that perform enrichment actions (VirusTotal lookups, user lookups, ticket creation) can remain in place. ManySignal replaces the detection, triage, and verdict layer that feeds into those workflows. A typical transition runs in parallel for 4–6 weeks: ManySignal triage feeds Tines downstream actions until the team is confident, then Tines scope narrows to pure orchestration.
Does ManySignal replace a SIEM or work alongside one?
ManySignal ingests log data directly and ships detections, so for most teams it replaces the SIEM as the primary detection and investigation surface. Teams that have substantial SIEM investment can pipe SIEM alerts into ManySignal for triage without re-ingesting raw logs, though per-GB SIEM costs then remain.
How do the pricing models compare between Tines and ManySignal?
Tines is priced per-workflow or per-user depending on the tier, with a free community tier available. ManySignal is priced per asset (user + device) on an annual subscription. For teams running Tines heavily, the all-in cost of Tines plus the SIEM and security tooling it orchestrates is often higher than ManySignal's all-in platform pricing. The comparison depends heavily on how many Tines Stories you're running and what they're calling.
Which choice is better for a team with one or two security engineers rather than a full SOC?
For teams with limited security engineering headcount, ManySignal is typically the better fit. Building and maintaining Tines Stories that replicate detection logic, entity graph traversal, and intelligent triage requires sustained engineering investment. ManySignal ships that capability — the engineering headcount cost to maintain it is on ManySignal's side, not yours. Tines delivers most value when you have dedicated engineering capacity to build and operate the logic layer.
How does the autonomy governance model compare between the two platforms?
Tines has no built-in autonomy governance model — the logic for when to act autonomously vs. when to require approval is whatever you code into your Stories. ManySignal ships an explicit autonomy ladder: per-action-class policies (autonomous, approval-gated, recommend-only), blast-radius limits, kill switch, and dry-run previews. For organisations that need documented, auditable AI governance, ManySignal's built-in model is meaningfully easier to demonstrate to auditors than a custom Tines implementation.
Related comparisons
See the agentic SOC in action
Watch AI agents work a real alert queue — verdicts, evidence, and confidence scores included. In-house SOC or MDR, your call.